Deutsch
Français
Español
Italiano
Português
中文
日本語
Русский
Türkçe
MAGA FAGGOT CHIEF DELIRIOUS AGAIN AND AGAIN
Duration: 0:13
Views: 20
Submitted: 1 month ago
Submitted by:
Description:
American Citizenship Gor Sale like Slovenian white ass! Why a $5M U.S. Citizenship Investment Doesn’t Make Sense?
Which senile Global investor wants to pay five million ONLy to be taxed on their entire global income?
Get right to dispelling government King fuckin Rat Trump bullshit as I mathematically compare the U.S. EB-5 GOLD or whatever this lame crap will be called to other superior global citizenship-by-investment (CBI) programs with stronger passports and far better ROI.
U.S. Scumbag G-faggot EB-5 Program: Costs vs. Benefits;
Total Minimum Investment:
Base Investment: Currently $800k (TEA) or $1.05M (non-TEA).
-Fees: ~$50k (legal, administrative).
- Time to Mother-Fucked Worthless American G-Faggot Citizenship: 5–7 years (green card first, citizenship later).
Opportunity Cost Analysis:
Assume an investor wants immediate citizenship (not just residency) and invests $5M instead of $800k. Let’s calculate the Net Present Value (NPV) which will be lost by overpaying:
\[
\{Excess Investment} = \$5M - \$1.05M = \$3.95M
\]
Investing the excess $3.95M in the S&P 500 (historical annual return: ~10%) over 5 years:
\[
\{Future Value} = \$3.95M \times (1 + 0.10)^5 = \$6.36M
\]
And. Ow Opportunity Cost:
\[
\$6.36M - \$5M = \mathbf{\$1.36M \, lost \, potential \, gains}.
\]
Key Issues:
- The U.S. program does not guarantee citizenship, only residency.
- Visa-free score: U.S. passport = 188 countries (3rd place globally), but comparable passports cost far less (see my info below).
My Analysis of Better Citizenship-by-Investment Passports from countries with stronger financial value, faster processing, and comparable visa-free access to that of American G-fag issued:
A. Malta (Ranked 1st in Visa-Free Access)
- Investment: €690k (donation + real estate) + €150k charity.
- Time to Citizenship: 1–3 years.
- Visa-Free: 191 countries (EU, Schengen, USA).
- NPV Advantage: Immediate EU citizenship vs. 5-year U.S. wait.
B. St. Kitts & Nevis
- Investment: $150k (donation) or $200k (real estate).
- Time to Citizenship: ONLY (Get This Good!) 3–6 months.
- Visa-Free: 157 countries (UK, Schengen).
- Cost Efficiency: 90% cheaper than U.S. EB-5.
C. Grenada
- Investment: $150k (donation) or $220k (real estate).
- Time to Citizenship: 4–6 months.
- Visa-Free: 148 countries + U.S. E-2 Visa Treaty access.
- ROI: Adds U.S. business visa eligibility for 1/5th the cost.
D. Portugal (Golden Visa → Citizenship)
- Investment: €350k (real estate).
- Time to Citizenship: 5 years (EU passport).
- Visa-Free: 191 countries.
- Advantage: Lower cost, EU residency en route.
E. Antigua & Barbuda
- Investment: $100k (donation) or $200k (real estate).
- Time to Citizenship: 3–6 months.
- Visa-Free: 151 countries (UK, Schengen).
My Mathematical Comparison:
Let’s Assume for arguments sake that an investor wants visa-free access to both the U.S. and EU:
*On small capacitive touchscreen table will be displayed improperly formatted so use your stupid fuckin head bitches to figure out what is what duh!
| Country | Total Cost | Visa-Free Score | Years to Citizenship | $5M Opportunity Cost Saved|
|-------------|----------------|----------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------------|
| U.S. EB-5 | $1.05M + 5 yrs | 188 | 5–7 | $0 (baseline) |
| Malta | €840k (~$900k) | 191 | 1–3 | Save $4.1M + gain EU citizenship|
| Grenada | $220k | 148 (+E-2 Visa) | 0.5 | Save $4.78M + E-2 access |
My Key Takeaway:
Investing $5M in the U.S. EB-5 is irrational when:
1. Malta offers a better passport (191 vs. 188 countries) for 1/5th the cost.
2. Grenada provides a path to the U.S. via the E-2 visa for 95% less.
3. The $3.95M saved could generate $1.36M in 5 years if invested elsewhere duh!
Why the U.S. EB-5 Fails Financially?
- No Citizenship Guarantee: Only residency.
- Low Liquidity: Funds locked for 5+ years.
- Higher Taxes: U.S. citizens pay global income tax.
- Alternatives: EU/Schengen passports offer better mobility and tax optimization cause once you start earning mucho dinero you gottuh optimize your tax predicament so move to Puerto Rico the floating garbage island and save big!
Top 5 Passports by Investment (2023) nothing personal, just Math!
1. Malta (191 countries) – €690k+
2. Portugal (191 countries) – €350k+
3. St. Kitts & Nevis (157 countries) – $150k
4. Grenada (148 countries + E-2 Visa) – $150k
5. Antigua & Barbuda (151 countries) – $100k
So I’m clueless why g-faghot Trump who spent his entire life cooking his tax books and on what basis this stupid old American senile fuck believes that mathematically and strategically, the U.S. EB-5 program would be seen as a golden goose when it is a poor choice for investors seeking citizenship and Global access! Superior passports with equal or greater visa-free access are available for 80–95% less with far faster processing and no requirement to live in the U.S. The $5M investment this senile g-fag President Authoritarian wannabe would be far better deployed in markets or cheaper CBI programs but NOT in mother fucked USA! So where do I think YOU should INVEST your MONEY?
Not USA for sure so lemme break it down for you cause you appear Mathematically RETARDED! Now, I don’t dispense financial advice cause this is a fuck you site but I will make this exception just to show American Passport by Investment is complete shit and I will clarify that by simply analyzing why Asia Often Outperforms the U.S. for Investments and investors time after time like a Swiss clock so let’s evaluate why Asia offers superior investment returns compared to the U.S., by analyzing key financial metrics you should have at least basic fuck grasp on such as “GDP growth, demographics, labor costs, market saturation, and risk-adjusted returns. Below is my pretty detailed breakdown for a fuck you satire site video share this my bit he’s is the new Mathematical Fred Astaire!
Let’s Dissect GDP Growth Differential
Asia’s Growth Premium:
- U.S. GDP Growth (2023): ~2.1% (CBO projection).
- Asia’s GDP Growth:
- India: 6.3%
- Vietnam: 5.8%
- Philippines: 5.6%
- Weighted Average (ex-China): ~5.2%.
Now Let’s See Compounded Growth Advantage:
Over 10 years, a $1M investment growing at Asia’s 5.2% vs. U.S. 2.1%:
\[
\{Asia: } \$1M \ X (1 + 0.052)^{10} = \$1.67M
\]
\[
\{U.S.: } \$1M \ X (1 + 0.021)^{10} = \$1.23M
\]
Difference: \$440k (35% higher returns in Asia)
so Asia wins hands down!
Now Let’s Look at Their Labor Cost Efficiency:
Manufacturing Wage Comparison:
- U.S.: \$36.50/hour (BLS, 2023).
- Vietnam: \$3.00/hour.
- India: \$1.50/hour.
Cost Savings by Aboiding USA Alltogether:
For a factory with 100 workers operating 2,000 hours/year:
\[
\{U.S. Cost: } 100 \ X 2,000 \ X 36.50 = \$7.3M
\]
\[
\{Vietnam Cost: } 100 \ X 2,000 \ X 3.00 = \$600k
\]
Savings: \$6.7M/year reinvested can compound at 5.2% GDP growth.
OwnLet’s Look at “Demographic Dividends”
Working-Age Population Growth (2023–2050):
- U.S.: +4% (slow growth, aging senile population, oxymoronic cannabis addicted youth).
- India: +20% (median age: 28 years).
- Philippines: +25% (median age: 25 years).
Consumer Market Expansion:
A 1% rise in working-age population correlates with ~0.5% GDP growth (IMF) so that means for Country of India:
\[
\{Demographic GDP Boost} = 20\% \ X 0.5 = 10\% \, \{over 27 years}.
\]
While American shutter U.S. gains only:
\[
4\% \ X 0.5 = 2\% \, \{over 27 years}.
\]
Let’s Glance at Market Saturation & Returns;
Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratios:
- S&P 500 (U.S.): 25x (overvalued by historical standards).
- MSCI Asia ex-Japan: 15x (undervalued relative to growth).
OwnLet’s Analyze Expected Earnings Yield:
\[
\{U.S.: } \frac{1}{25} = 4\% \quad \{Asia: } \frac{1}{15} = 6.7\%
\]
and Next — Equity Risk Premium (ERP):
\[
\{Asia ERP} = 6.7\% - 2.1\% \, (\{U.S. risk-free rate}) = 4.6\%
\]
\[
\{U.S. ERP} = 4\% - 2.1\% = 1.9\%
\]
So we see that Asia offers 2.4x higher compensation for risk.
Now Let’s Look at Sector-Specific Growth (CAGR)
| Sector | Asia CAGR (2023–2030) | U.S. CAGR |
|---------------------|---------------------------|---------------|
| E-Commerce | 12% | 8% |
| Renewable Energy | 15% | 6% |
| Fintech | 18% | 10% |
My Example: A \$100k investment in Asian renewables vs. U.S. renewables over 7 years:
\[
\{Asia: } \$100k \ X (1 + 0.15)^7 = \$266k
\]
\[
\{U.S.: } \$100k \ X (1 + 0.06)^7 = \$150k
\]
Difference: + \$116k (77% higher in Asia).
And Next Let’s Do a Risk-Adjusted Returns (Called Sharpe Ratio)
\[
\(Sharpe Ratio} = \frac{\{Return} - \{Risk-Free Rate}}{\{Volatility}}
\]
- MSCI Asia ex-Japan (5Y Avg): Return = 9%, Volatility = 18%, Risk-Free Rate = 2.1%
\[
\{Sharpe} = \frac{9 - 2.1}{18} = 0.38
\]
- S&P 500 (5Y Avg): Return = 11%, Volatility = 16%, Risk-Free Rate = 2.1%
\[
\{Sharpe} = \frac{11 - 2.1}{16} = 0.56
\]
My Conclusory FACT; While the U.S. has a higher Sharpe Ratio, Asia’s growth-adjusted upside (e.g., India’s GDP growing 3x faster) offsets this for long-term investments and DIVE$TING from American Markets should be long term ONLY STRATEGY!
Fake Dollar? FIAT CURRENCY? Then Let’s do a Quickie Currency Appreciation Potential:
Emerging Asian currencies (e.g., INR, VND) are undervalued by 20–40% against the USD (Big Mac Index). A 2% annual appreciation adds to USD-denominated returns as follows:
\[
\{Total Return} = \{Asset Return} + \{Currency Return}
\]
So; For a 9% asset return + 2% currency gain:
\[
= 11\% \, \{vs. U.S. domestic 11\% with no currency boost}.
\]
Now Let’s Do a Quickie Infrastructure Multiplier Effect:
Asia needs \$1.7T/year in infrastructure investment (ADB). Public-private partnerships often yield 12–15% returns, vs. 6–8% for U.S. shit-ridden g-fag municipal bonds.
So what can we conclude from this light quickie Mayhematical analysis and comparison of USA to Asia?
That Mathematically, Asia’s higher GDP growth, much MUCH lower labor costs, demographic momentum, and sectoral CAGR advantages create superior risk-adjusted returns vs. the U.S. Key risks (Trump the senile old Gump related political instability, regulatory hurdles) are priced into valuations, leaving asymmetric upside.
\[
\{Asia Offers 5–7\% Higher Annualized Returns Over 10+ Years}}
\]
Worth a mention that American g-fag shitland is currently politically charged and UNSTABLE while Asia dominates in growth-stage opportunities and superior multi dimensional manufacturing sector with Global order fulfillment American g-fags can only dream of so go with Asian and steer clear of USA
because prudent shrewd investors will abstain from investing in USA due to my aforementioned mathematical analysis and the only way you can discern they are shrewd and Mathematically driven is because they will be HOARDING CASH stead of pissing it away into American Debt INFESTED WATERS where Titanic’s sink second they are in OPEN WATER!
#GoodLuck
Qwack like a duck and China will have you for LUNCH so STOP QWACKING Donald Duck!
#QwackLessDoMore
Which senile Global investor wants to pay five million ONLy to be taxed on their entire global income?
Get right to dispelling government King fuckin Rat Trump bullshit as I mathematically compare the U.S. EB-5 GOLD or whatever this lame crap will be called to other superior global citizenship-by-investment (CBI) programs with stronger passports and far better ROI.
U.S. Scumbag G-faggot EB-5 Program: Costs vs. Benefits;
Total Minimum Investment:
Base Investment: Currently $800k (TEA) or $1.05M (non-TEA).
-Fees: ~$50k (legal, administrative).
- Time to Mother-Fucked Worthless American G-Faggot Citizenship: 5–7 years (green card first, citizenship later).
Opportunity Cost Analysis:
Assume an investor wants immediate citizenship (not just residency) and invests $5M instead of $800k. Let’s calculate the Net Present Value (NPV) which will be lost by overpaying:
\[
\{Excess Investment} = \$5M - \$1.05M = \$3.95M
\]
Investing the excess $3.95M in the S&P 500 (historical annual return: ~10%) over 5 years:
\[
\{Future Value} = \$3.95M \times (1 + 0.10)^5 = \$6.36M
\]
And. Ow Opportunity Cost:
\[
\$6.36M - \$5M = \mathbf{\$1.36M \, lost \, potential \, gains}.
\]
Key Issues:
- The U.S. program does not guarantee citizenship, only residency.
- Visa-free score: U.S. passport = 188 countries (3rd place globally), but comparable passports cost far less (see my info below).
My Analysis of Better Citizenship-by-Investment Passports from countries with stronger financial value, faster processing, and comparable visa-free access to that of American G-fag issued:
A. Malta (Ranked 1st in Visa-Free Access)
- Investment: €690k (donation + real estate) + €150k charity.
- Time to Citizenship: 1–3 years.
- Visa-Free: 191 countries (EU, Schengen, USA).
- NPV Advantage: Immediate EU citizenship vs. 5-year U.S. wait.
B. St. Kitts & Nevis
- Investment: $150k (donation) or $200k (real estate).
- Time to Citizenship: ONLY (Get This Good!) 3–6 months.
- Visa-Free: 157 countries (UK, Schengen).
- Cost Efficiency: 90% cheaper than U.S. EB-5.
C. Grenada
- Investment: $150k (donation) or $220k (real estate).
- Time to Citizenship: 4–6 months.
- Visa-Free: 148 countries + U.S. E-2 Visa Treaty access.
- ROI: Adds U.S. business visa eligibility for 1/5th the cost.
D. Portugal (Golden Visa → Citizenship)
- Investment: €350k (real estate).
- Time to Citizenship: 5 years (EU passport).
- Visa-Free: 191 countries.
- Advantage: Lower cost, EU residency en route.
E. Antigua & Barbuda
- Investment: $100k (donation) or $200k (real estate).
- Time to Citizenship: 3–6 months.
- Visa-Free: 151 countries (UK, Schengen).
My Mathematical Comparison:
Let’s Assume for arguments sake that an investor wants visa-free access to both the U.S. and EU:
*On small capacitive touchscreen table will be displayed improperly formatted so use your stupid fuckin head bitches to figure out what is what duh!
| Country | Total Cost | Visa-Free Score | Years to Citizenship | $5M Opportunity Cost Saved|
|-------------|----------------|----------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------------|
| U.S. EB-5 | $1.05M + 5 yrs | 188 | 5–7 | $0 (baseline) |
| Malta | €840k (~$900k) | 191 | 1–3 | Save $4.1M + gain EU citizenship|
| Grenada | $220k | 148 (+E-2 Visa) | 0.5 | Save $4.78M + E-2 access |
My Key Takeaway:
Investing $5M in the U.S. EB-5 is irrational when:
1. Malta offers a better passport (191 vs. 188 countries) for 1/5th the cost.
2. Grenada provides a path to the U.S. via the E-2 visa for 95% less.
3. The $3.95M saved could generate $1.36M in 5 years if invested elsewhere duh!
Why the U.S. EB-5 Fails Financially?
- No Citizenship Guarantee: Only residency.
- Low Liquidity: Funds locked for 5+ years.
- Higher Taxes: U.S. citizens pay global income tax.
- Alternatives: EU/Schengen passports offer better mobility and tax optimization cause once you start earning mucho dinero you gottuh optimize your tax predicament so move to Puerto Rico the floating garbage island and save big!
Top 5 Passports by Investment (2023) nothing personal, just Math!
1. Malta (191 countries) – €690k+
2. Portugal (191 countries) – €350k+
3. St. Kitts & Nevis (157 countries) – $150k
4. Grenada (148 countries + E-2 Visa) – $150k
5. Antigua & Barbuda (151 countries) – $100k
So I’m clueless why g-faghot Trump who spent his entire life cooking his tax books and on what basis this stupid old American senile fuck believes that mathematically and strategically, the U.S. EB-5 program would be seen as a golden goose when it is a poor choice for investors seeking citizenship and Global access! Superior passports with equal or greater visa-free access are available for 80–95% less with far faster processing and no requirement to live in the U.S. The $5M investment this senile g-fag President Authoritarian wannabe would be far better deployed in markets or cheaper CBI programs but NOT in mother fucked USA! So where do I think YOU should INVEST your MONEY?
Not USA for sure so lemme break it down for you cause you appear Mathematically RETARDED! Now, I don’t dispense financial advice cause this is a fuck you site but I will make this exception just to show American Passport by Investment is complete shit and I will clarify that by simply analyzing why Asia Often Outperforms the U.S. for Investments and investors time after time like a Swiss clock so let’s evaluate why Asia offers superior investment returns compared to the U.S., by analyzing key financial metrics you should have at least basic fuck grasp on such as “GDP growth, demographics, labor costs, market saturation, and risk-adjusted returns. Below is my pretty detailed breakdown for a fuck you satire site video share this my bit he’s is the new Mathematical Fred Astaire!
Let’s Dissect GDP Growth Differential
Asia’s Growth Premium:
- U.S. GDP Growth (2023): ~2.1% (CBO projection).
- Asia’s GDP Growth:
- India: 6.3%
- Vietnam: 5.8%
- Philippines: 5.6%
- Weighted Average (ex-China): ~5.2%.
Now Let’s See Compounded Growth Advantage:
Over 10 years, a $1M investment growing at Asia’s 5.2% vs. U.S. 2.1%:
\[
\{Asia: } \$1M \ X (1 + 0.052)^{10} = \$1.67M
\]
\[
\{U.S.: } \$1M \ X (1 + 0.021)^{10} = \$1.23M
\]
Difference: \$440k (35% higher returns in Asia)
so Asia wins hands down!
Now Let’s Look at Their Labor Cost Efficiency:
Manufacturing Wage Comparison:
- U.S.: \$36.50/hour (BLS, 2023).
- Vietnam: \$3.00/hour.
- India: \$1.50/hour.
Cost Savings by Aboiding USA Alltogether:
For a factory with 100 workers operating 2,000 hours/year:
\[
\{U.S. Cost: } 100 \ X 2,000 \ X 36.50 = \$7.3M
\]
\[
\{Vietnam Cost: } 100 \ X 2,000 \ X 3.00 = \$600k
\]
Savings: \$6.7M/year reinvested can compound at 5.2% GDP growth.
OwnLet’s Look at “Demographic Dividends”
Working-Age Population Growth (2023–2050):
- U.S.: +4% (slow growth, aging senile population, oxymoronic cannabis addicted youth).
- India: +20% (median age: 28 years).
- Philippines: +25% (median age: 25 years).
Consumer Market Expansion:
A 1% rise in working-age population correlates with ~0.5% GDP growth (IMF) so that means for Country of India:
\[
\{Demographic GDP Boost} = 20\% \ X 0.5 = 10\% \, \{over 27 years}.
\]
While American shutter U.S. gains only:
\[
4\% \ X 0.5 = 2\% \, \{over 27 years}.
\]
Let’s Glance at Market Saturation & Returns;
Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratios:
- S&P 500 (U.S.): 25x (overvalued by historical standards).
- MSCI Asia ex-Japan: 15x (undervalued relative to growth).
OwnLet’s Analyze Expected Earnings Yield:
\[
\{U.S.: } \frac{1}{25} = 4\% \quad \{Asia: } \frac{1}{15} = 6.7\%
\]
and Next — Equity Risk Premium (ERP):
\[
\{Asia ERP} = 6.7\% - 2.1\% \, (\{U.S. risk-free rate}) = 4.6\%
\]
\[
\{U.S. ERP} = 4\% - 2.1\% = 1.9\%
\]
So we see that Asia offers 2.4x higher compensation for risk.
Now Let’s Look at Sector-Specific Growth (CAGR)
| Sector | Asia CAGR (2023–2030) | U.S. CAGR |
|---------------------|---------------------------|---------------|
| E-Commerce | 12% | 8% |
| Renewable Energy | 15% | 6% |
| Fintech | 18% | 10% |
My Example: A \$100k investment in Asian renewables vs. U.S. renewables over 7 years:
\[
\{Asia: } \$100k \ X (1 + 0.15)^7 = \$266k
\]
\[
\{U.S.: } \$100k \ X (1 + 0.06)^7 = \$150k
\]
Difference: + \$116k (77% higher in Asia).
And Next Let’s Do a Risk-Adjusted Returns (Called Sharpe Ratio)
\[
\(Sharpe Ratio} = \frac{\{Return} - \{Risk-Free Rate}}{\{Volatility}}
\]
- MSCI Asia ex-Japan (5Y Avg): Return = 9%, Volatility = 18%, Risk-Free Rate = 2.1%
\[
\{Sharpe} = \frac{9 - 2.1}{18} = 0.38
\]
- S&P 500 (5Y Avg): Return = 11%, Volatility = 16%, Risk-Free Rate = 2.1%
\[
\{Sharpe} = \frac{11 - 2.1}{16} = 0.56
\]
My Conclusory FACT; While the U.S. has a higher Sharpe Ratio, Asia’s growth-adjusted upside (e.g., India’s GDP growing 3x faster) offsets this for long-term investments and DIVE$TING from American Markets should be long term ONLY STRATEGY!
Fake Dollar? FIAT CURRENCY? Then Let’s do a Quickie Currency Appreciation Potential:
Emerging Asian currencies (e.g., INR, VND) are undervalued by 20–40% against the USD (Big Mac Index). A 2% annual appreciation adds to USD-denominated returns as follows:
\[
\{Total Return} = \{Asset Return} + \{Currency Return}
\]
So; For a 9% asset return + 2% currency gain:
\[
= 11\% \, \{vs. U.S. domestic 11\% with no currency boost}.
\]
Now Let’s Do a Quickie Infrastructure Multiplier Effect:
Asia needs \$1.7T/year in infrastructure investment (ADB). Public-private partnerships often yield 12–15% returns, vs. 6–8% for U.S. shit-ridden g-fag municipal bonds.
So what can we conclude from this light quickie Mayhematical analysis and comparison of USA to Asia?
That Mathematically, Asia’s higher GDP growth, much MUCH lower labor costs, demographic momentum, and sectoral CAGR advantages create superior risk-adjusted returns vs. the U.S. Key risks (Trump the senile old Gump related political instability, regulatory hurdles) are priced into valuations, leaving asymmetric upside.
\[
\{Asia Offers 5–7\% Higher Annualized Returns Over 10+ Years}}
\]
Worth a mention that American g-fag shitland is currently politically charged and UNSTABLE while Asia dominates in growth-stage opportunities and superior multi dimensional manufacturing sector with Global order fulfillment American g-fags can only dream of so go with Asian and steer clear of USA
because prudent shrewd investors will abstain from investing in USA due to my aforementioned mathematical analysis and the only way you can discern they are shrewd and Mathematically driven is because they will be HOARDING CASH stead of pissing it away into American Debt INFESTED WATERS where Titanic’s sink second they are in OPEN WATER!
#GoodLuck
Qwack like a duck and China will have you for LUNCH so STOP QWACKING Donald Duck!
#QwackLessDoMore
Categories:
People and Blogs
