Deutsch
Français
Español
Italiano
Português
中文
日本語
Русский
Türkçe
Protesting Against Federal Law Under Trump the Draft Dodger
Duration: 0:25
Views: 3
Submitted: 3 days ago
Submitted by:
Description:
Any issues?
One sided…
True metric of Dekocracy is tolerance level of opposition so same as Americanos ran each other over with cars during elections, this stinks like Jewish faculty members are trying to quash ANY opposition of carnage Israel carried out in Gaza as retribution for Hamas attacks…
No real data on how many Jewish students attend COLUMBIA COLLEGE but since it is mostly for well heeled students I’d say percentage wise approximately 22.5% of Columbia University's undergraduate student body is Jewish. This translates to roughly 1,500 students out of their total 6,668 undergraduate students. For graduate students, about 15.5% (around 3,500 students out of 22,613) are Jewish so if you protest like a mother fucker YOU are going to get FUCKIN STONED by Jews bitch!
No shit! And with some of their faculty inclusive of individuals like Rebecca Kobrin, Elisheva Carlebach, Beth Berkowitz, Clemence Boulouque, and Yinon Cohen, if you only a Green Card Holder, you know that under Nazi Trump Regime they gonnuh deploy their I E dogs and ship your ass down to Louisiana where redneck MAGA fags are sworn Immigration Judges and anything less of a citizenship you will be fuckin crucified lol!
I knew and predicted USA’s transition to FASCISM way back in 2006 so this nothing new to me in the slightest but this individual has absolutely never before been arrested in USA for ANYTHING so this arrest is as phony as American LINERTY in which case I choose NOT to be a member of this pussy club because if I believe in one thing it is in the right to voice your opinion to your opposition because humans are NOT mother fucked cock suckin “Rubio iRobots” and speaking of Israel and Palestine, I support a Two State solution!
If nobody could voice any dissent then USA is one mother fucked Nazi State under Fascist Mathematical retard named Donald Draft-Dodger Trump!
State of Israel needs to be compelled to a Two State solution otherwise this will never end and will go on for anither 500 years because humans are too stupid to Colonize even the Moon but on Earth all land is spoken for and none is being made anymore cause God retired from land making..
Green Card Holder, never been arrested before, and now a redneck fuck MAGA stamped his deportation…
I go down to New Orleans every few years and have acquaintances down there but none of them is this fuckin stupid and ignorant…
Everyone has a right to protest peacefully even if they take the side of grandma and toddler abducting and killing Hamas because nothing in the U.S. Constitutional Law protesting for a well documented terrorist organization it this gentleman was protesting on behalf of Palestine not Hamas so neither of the two is against U.S. Law…
He definitely got Jew-love and that is for sure!
But what is a trade signature if a Fascist Regimenis what the immigration Nudge stated to Mahmoud’s legal counsel and that is her finding that his “Constitutional argument has no place in Immigration Court” so right there you know these bastard Immigration Judges are phonies, basic fascists dishing FASCIST REGIME POLICIES!
Time to dismantle the Statue of Liberty and ship it to Estados UNIDOS de Mexicanos, my favorite nation on planet earth!
Legal aspect of it?
What Casita de Wjite Trump Devilnis using on this protester does not fit the bill..
Why?
I just poured over Section 237(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) with a fine tooth comb (codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(4)(C)) which by Maerican Law addresses the deportability of noncitizens so (aliens) who engage in activities related to terrorism, but mere peaceful protesting is not terrorism…
Let’s break American immigration laws down to bits and digestible pieces without a single fucked law degree..
Legal Text and Cross-References?
Their statute states:
"Any alien who has engaged, is engaged, or at any time after admission engages in any activity described in subparagraph (A)(i) or (B) of section 1182(a)(3) of this title is deportable."
Okay, hot that.. But then; This cross-references two provisions in their “8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)” (the inadmissibility grounds for security and terrorism):
- § 1182(a)(3)(A)(i): Covers aliens who have engaged in or incited terrorist activity. (Mr. Mahmoud has not…)
- § 1182(a)(3)(B): Defines terrorist organizations and activities, including material support. (Organizing a protest at Columbia does not meet that criterion…)
What Are Their Key Elements of Deportability?
a. Covered Activities
An alien is deportable under § 237(a)(4)(C) if they:
- Engaged in terrorist activity (e.g., planning, committing, or threatening violent acts).
- Provided material support to a designated terrorist organization (e.g., funding, training, logistics).
- Are members of a terrorist organization (if the group is designated by the U.S. government). Mr. Mahmoud has done no such thing..
b. Temporal Scope
- Applies to activities before or after admission to the U.S.
- Even lawful permanent residents (green card holders) can be deported for post-admission conduct. But Mr. Mahmoud despite having been born in Syria has no been a terrorist ever..
Definitions and Case Law?
a. "Terrorist Activity"
Defined in § 1182(a)(3)(B)(iii) as:
- Hijacking, sabotage, assassination, or use of weapons/explosives.
- Threatening, planning, or inciting such acts.
b. "Material Support"
Broadly interpreted by Americano-courts to include any tangible or intangible assistance, even if minimal or unintentional. However, exemptions exist for:
- Support provided under duress (e.g., coerced by threats).
- Certain medical or religious assistance (via statutory exceptions).
c. Membership in Terrorist Organizations
- Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO’s) Defined by the Secretary of State under 8 U.S.C. § 1189.
- “Material Support" Bar: Membership alone may suffice for deportability if the group is designated.
Procedural Aspects?
a. Burden of Proof
- The government must prove deportability by “clear and convincing evidence" (higher than the "preponderance of evidence" standard in most immigration cases
So don’t Confuse the two my little bitches!).
b. Removal Proceedings
- Aliens may challenge deportability in immigration court.
- Defenses include proving activities were non-terrorist in nature or qualifying for exemptions (e.g., duress).
c. Judicial Review
- Limited under their “terrorism bar" as per their (8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C)), (jus reviewed it all…) restricting appeals for final orders of removal based on terrorism grounds.
AmeriKKKan Constitutional and Policy Considerations?
a. First Amendment Concerns
- Courts have upheld that membership in designated FTO’s, even without active participation, is not protected speech/association (Case Law I dug up? “Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 2010”).
b. Retroactivity
- Activities predating an organization’s FTO designation may still trigger deportation.
c. Humanitarian Exceptions
- Waivers are available for material support provided under duress or in certain medical/religious contexts (e.g., treating injured combatants).
Practical Implications?
- Broad Enforcement: Used to deport individuals with ties to groups like Al-Qaeda, ISIS, or Hamas.
My issue with this statute? It’s fuckin VAGUE! So vague that this statute’s “vagueness” risks ensnaring individuals with minimal or unintentional ties to terrorism — or by simply
Protesting for Palestine indirectly ties Mahmoud to supporting Hamas inadvertently because they run the fuckin Palestine and all the Media and law experts missed this INDIRECT KINK either due to their lack of knowledge or low fuckin IQ?
My Example Scenario For You?
An LPR (green card holder) donates to a Palestinian charity later designated as an FTO. If the Trump government proves the charity funded terrorism and the donor knew (or should have known), the donor could face deportation under § 237(a)(4)(C). Even if they just wanted to help Palestinians who are destitute because Hamas Charity was a recipient’s one of their offshoots but Inuse this just as an example of how broad this vagueness can be, it’s a freaqin g-fag prosecutors wet dream cause they get to stretch or shrink it as they see fit!
I think that their 237(a)(4)(C) is critical to their Americano national security tool and will serve them for what it was intended to do in THEIR U.S. immigration BODY OF law which is to enablle the removal of noncitizens involved in terrorism. And it’s broad language and reliance on executive designations of FTO’s which they will have no issues of addressing under Trump who wants to fuck Muslims to get revenge for 9/11 cause they demolished without a single Permit while has to kiss asses to get approvals and perhaps bribe here and there with his fixers — underscore the balance government has to be careful not to disrupt between security and civil liberties. I hope that Mr. Mahmoud’s legal counsel will be able To overcome legal challenges and laser focus on procedural fairness to vindicate his client of any wrongdoing…
I’m glad that I expanded an hour to glance at the body of Immigratiin Law, very interesting topic…
Now go fuck off and don’t lemme catch you clicking on my site or I will shove it up your fuckin asses with entire source code little worthless fuckin bitches!
Jus kidding..
*THEOLOGICAL sidenote WORTH CONSIDERATION;
Since Prophet Muhammad is still laying in his grave, but Jesus Christ ROSE from the dead on the third day, both Jews and Muslims have gotten this part wrong as Jesus clearly far more than a Prophet depicted in Quran and in Judaism the Messiah they are waiting for but it’s not the first time Jews missed their salvation and Christians came to save them…
No?
“It’s very HARD for BLIND PEOPLE to NAVIGATE so that’s why you gottuh GRAB THEM them by the arm and LEAD THEM to them correct destination — otherwise they end up going around in circles all day — like Donald Trump at the Oval Office…”
-Stateless Warrior
That’s also why Elton John doesn’t suck his boyfriends dick anymore — because he can’t see WHERE IT IS…
One sided…
True metric of Dekocracy is tolerance level of opposition so same as Americanos ran each other over with cars during elections, this stinks like Jewish faculty members are trying to quash ANY opposition of carnage Israel carried out in Gaza as retribution for Hamas attacks…
No real data on how many Jewish students attend COLUMBIA COLLEGE but since it is mostly for well heeled students I’d say percentage wise approximately 22.5% of Columbia University's undergraduate student body is Jewish. This translates to roughly 1,500 students out of their total 6,668 undergraduate students. For graduate students, about 15.5% (around 3,500 students out of 22,613) are Jewish so if you protest like a mother fucker YOU are going to get FUCKIN STONED by Jews bitch!
No shit! And with some of their faculty inclusive of individuals like Rebecca Kobrin, Elisheva Carlebach, Beth Berkowitz, Clemence Boulouque, and Yinon Cohen, if you only a Green Card Holder, you know that under Nazi Trump Regime they gonnuh deploy their I E dogs and ship your ass down to Louisiana where redneck MAGA fags are sworn Immigration Judges and anything less of a citizenship you will be fuckin crucified lol!
I knew and predicted USA’s transition to FASCISM way back in 2006 so this nothing new to me in the slightest but this individual has absolutely never before been arrested in USA for ANYTHING so this arrest is as phony as American LINERTY in which case I choose NOT to be a member of this pussy club because if I believe in one thing it is in the right to voice your opinion to your opposition because humans are NOT mother fucked cock suckin “Rubio iRobots” and speaking of Israel and Palestine, I support a Two State solution!
If nobody could voice any dissent then USA is one mother fucked Nazi State under Fascist Mathematical retard named Donald Draft-Dodger Trump!
State of Israel needs to be compelled to a Two State solution otherwise this will never end and will go on for anither 500 years because humans are too stupid to Colonize even the Moon but on Earth all land is spoken for and none is being made anymore cause God retired from land making..
Green Card Holder, never been arrested before, and now a redneck fuck MAGA stamped his deportation…
I go down to New Orleans every few years and have acquaintances down there but none of them is this fuckin stupid and ignorant…
Everyone has a right to protest peacefully even if they take the side of grandma and toddler abducting and killing Hamas because nothing in the U.S. Constitutional Law protesting for a well documented terrorist organization it this gentleman was protesting on behalf of Palestine not Hamas so neither of the two is against U.S. Law…
He definitely got Jew-love and that is for sure!
But what is a trade signature if a Fascist Regimenis what the immigration Nudge stated to Mahmoud’s legal counsel and that is her finding that his “Constitutional argument has no place in Immigration Court” so right there you know these bastard Immigration Judges are phonies, basic fascists dishing FASCIST REGIME POLICIES!
Time to dismantle the Statue of Liberty and ship it to Estados UNIDOS de Mexicanos, my favorite nation on planet earth!
Legal aspect of it?
What Casita de Wjite Trump Devilnis using on this protester does not fit the bill..
Why?
I just poured over Section 237(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) with a fine tooth comb (codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(4)(C)) which by Maerican Law addresses the deportability of noncitizens so (aliens) who engage in activities related to terrorism, but mere peaceful protesting is not terrorism…
Let’s break American immigration laws down to bits and digestible pieces without a single fucked law degree..
Legal Text and Cross-References?
Their statute states:
"Any alien who has engaged, is engaged, or at any time after admission engages in any activity described in subparagraph (A)(i) or (B) of section 1182(a)(3) of this title is deportable."
Okay, hot that.. But then; This cross-references two provisions in their “8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)” (the inadmissibility grounds for security and terrorism):
- § 1182(a)(3)(A)(i): Covers aliens who have engaged in or incited terrorist activity. (Mr. Mahmoud has not…)
- § 1182(a)(3)(B): Defines terrorist organizations and activities, including material support. (Organizing a protest at Columbia does not meet that criterion…)
What Are Their Key Elements of Deportability?
a. Covered Activities
An alien is deportable under § 237(a)(4)(C) if they:
- Engaged in terrorist activity (e.g., planning, committing, or threatening violent acts).
- Provided material support to a designated terrorist organization (e.g., funding, training, logistics).
- Are members of a terrorist organization (if the group is designated by the U.S. government). Mr. Mahmoud has done no such thing..
b. Temporal Scope
- Applies to activities before or after admission to the U.S.
- Even lawful permanent residents (green card holders) can be deported for post-admission conduct. But Mr. Mahmoud despite having been born in Syria has no been a terrorist ever..
Definitions and Case Law?
a. "Terrorist Activity"
Defined in § 1182(a)(3)(B)(iii) as:
- Hijacking, sabotage, assassination, or use of weapons/explosives.
- Threatening, planning, or inciting such acts.
b. "Material Support"
Broadly interpreted by Americano-courts to include any tangible or intangible assistance, even if minimal or unintentional. However, exemptions exist for:
- Support provided under duress (e.g., coerced by threats).
- Certain medical or religious assistance (via statutory exceptions).
c. Membership in Terrorist Organizations
- Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO’s) Defined by the Secretary of State under 8 U.S.C. § 1189.
- “Material Support" Bar: Membership alone may suffice for deportability if the group is designated.
Procedural Aspects?
a. Burden of Proof
- The government must prove deportability by “clear and convincing evidence" (higher than the "preponderance of evidence" standard in most immigration cases
So don’t Confuse the two my little bitches!).
b. Removal Proceedings
- Aliens may challenge deportability in immigration court.
- Defenses include proving activities were non-terrorist in nature or qualifying for exemptions (e.g., duress).
c. Judicial Review
- Limited under their “terrorism bar" as per their (8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C)), (jus reviewed it all…) restricting appeals for final orders of removal based on terrorism grounds.
AmeriKKKan Constitutional and Policy Considerations?
a. First Amendment Concerns
- Courts have upheld that membership in designated FTO’s, even without active participation, is not protected speech/association (Case Law I dug up? “Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 2010”).
b. Retroactivity
- Activities predating an organization’s FTO designation may still trigger deportation.
c. Humanitarian Exceptions
- Waivers are available for material support provided under duress or in certain medical/religious contexts (e.g., treating injured combatants).
Practical Implications?
- Broad Enforcement: Used to deport individuals with ties to groups like Al-Qaeda, ISIS, or Hamas.
My issue with this statute? It’s fuckin VAGUE! So vague that this statute’s “vagueness” risks ensnaring individuals with minimal or unintentional ties to terrorism — or by simply
Protesting for Palestine indirectly ties Mahmoud to supporting Hamas inadvertently because they run the fuckin Palestine and all the Media and law experts missed this INDIRECT KINK either due to their lack of knowledge or low fuckin IQ?
My Example Scenario For You?
An LPR (green card holder) donates to a Palestinian charity later designated as an FTO. If the Trump government proves the charity funded terrorism and the donor knew (or should have known), the donor could face deportation under § 237(a)(4)(C). Even if they just wanted to help Palestinians who are destitute because Hamas Charity was a recipient’s one of their offshoots but Inuse this just as an example of how broad this vagueness can be, it’s a freaqin g-fag prosecutors wet dream cause they get to stretch or shrink it as they see fit!
I think that their 237(a)(4)(C) is critical to their Americano national security tool and will serve them for what it was intended to do in THEIR U.S. immigration BODY OF law which is to enablle the removal of noncitizens involved in terrorism. And it’s broad language and reliance on executive designations of FTO’s which they will have no issues of addressing under Trump who wants to fuck Muslims to get revenge for 9/11 cause they demolished without a single Permit while has to kiss asses to get approvals and perhaps bribe here and there with his fixers — underscore the balance government has to be careful not to disrupt between security and civil liberties. I hope that Mr. Mahmoud’s legal counsel will be able To overcome legal challenges and laser focus on procedural fairness to vindicate his client of any wrongdoing…
I’m glad that I expanded an hour to glance at the body of Immigratiin Law, very interesting topic…
Now go fuck off and don’t lemme catch you clicking on my site or I will shove it up your fuckin asses with entire source code little worthless fuckin bitches!
Jus kidding..
*THEOLOGICAL sidenote WORTH CONSIDERATION;
Since Prophet Muhammad is still laying in his grave, but Jesus Christ ROSE from the dead on the third day, both Jews and Muslims have gotten this part wrong as Jesus clearly far more than a Prophet depicted in Quran and in Judaism the Messiah they are waiting for but it’s not the first time Jews missed their salvation and Christians came to save them…
No?
“It’s very HARD for BLIND PEOPLE to NAVIGATE so that’s why you gottuh GRAB THEM them by the arm and LEAD THEM to them correct destination — otherwise they end up going around in circles all day — like Donald Trump at the Oval Office…”
-Stateless Warrior
That’s also why Elton John doesn’t suck his boyfriends dick anymore — because he can’t see WHERE IT IS…
Categories:
People and Blogs
